Protocol No: ECCT/19/03/05 Date of Protocol: 10-10-2018

Study Title:
A prospective study to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and impact of the RTS,S/AS01E vaccine in young children in sub-Saharan Africa (v1.0 11Oct2017): Site-specific protocol for Siaya County, western Kenya

A prospective study to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, impact of the RTS, S/AS01E vaccine in sub-Saharan Africa: Site-specific protocol for Siaya County, western Kenya

Study Objectives:
a) The co-primary objectives are;
  1. To estimate the incidence of AESI, and of other AEs leading to hospitalization or death, in children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E.
  2. To estimate the incidence of aetiology-confirmed meningitis in children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E.
b) The specific objectives to assess vaccine safety are;
  1. To estimate the incidence of aetiology-confirmed and/or probable meningitis (final classification).
  2. To estimate the incidence of probable meningitis (final classification).
  3. To estimate the incidence of aetiology-confirmed, probable and/or clinically suspected meningitis (final classification).
  4. To estimate the incidence of cerebral malaria (malaria diagnosed by rapid diagnostic test [RDT] and/or microscopy).
  5. To estimate the mortality rate (all-cause mortality and deaths attributed to malaria [including P. falciparum]), overall and by gender.
  6. To describe risk factors for AESI, other AE leading to hospitalisation or death, meningitis, and malaria.
  7. To describe the causes of hospitalisation (including AESI, other AE, meningitis and malaria).
  8. To describe the causes of death, overall and by gender.
  9. To assess the risk of febrile convulsions during the 7-day period and 1-month period following each dose of RTS,S/AS01E.
  10. To monitor trends over time of meningitis cases identified at site level (first line laboratory).
  11. To assess the potential association between vaccination and meningitis by comparing the incidence of aetiology-confirmed meningitis in children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E with the incidence of these events in children not vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E.
  12. To assess the potential association between vaccination and meningitis by comparing the incidence of aetiology-confirmed and/or probable meningitis in children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E with the incidence of these events in children not vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E.
  13. To assess the potential association between vaccination and meningitis by comparing the incidence of aetiology-confirmed, probable and/or clinically suspected meningitis in children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E with the incidence of these events in children not vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E.
  14. To assess the potential association between vaccination and AESI, and other AE leading to hospitalisation or death by comparing the incidence of these events in children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E with the incidence of these events in children not vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E.
  15. To assess the potential association between vaccination and cerebral malaria by comparing the incidence of these events in children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E with the incidence of these events in children not vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E.
  16. To assess the potential association, overall and by gender, between vaccination and death by comparing the incidence of these events in children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E with the incidence of these events in children not vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E.
The specific objectives to assess vaccine effectiveness and impact are;
 
To estimate the vaccine effectiveness (direct effect) and the impact (indirect, total and overall effects) of vaccination with RTS,S/AS01E on the incidence of any malaria (including P. falciparum malaria), severe malaria (including P. falciparum malaria) and cerebral malaria diagnosed by RDT and/or microscopy.
 
To estimate the vaccine effectiveness (direct effect) and impact (indirect, total and overall effects) of vaccination with RTS,S/AS01E on:
  • the prevalence of anaemia among hospitalised children.
  • the incidence of all-cause hospitalisations and hospitalisations attributed to malaria (including P. falciparum).
  • the mortality rate (all-cause mortality and deaths attributed to malaria [including P. falciparum]) overall and by gender.
Laymans Summary:

The burden of malaria in the world has reduced over the last 15 years. This reduction has been attributed mainly to the rapid increase of key malaria control interventions including long-lasting mosquito nets that contain insecticides, spraying houses with insecticides and quick detection and treatment of malaria cases with drugs that work well. However, these gains are delicate and are threatened by parasites that are not killed by the drugs for malaria and mosquitos that are not killed by insecticides. Additional methods are urgently needed to add on to the current ones that are used to control malaria. In the past, vaccines have been shown to be one of the most affordable means of preventing diseases that are spread from one person to another and saving lives. Therefore, a malaria vaccine could be an important additional tool that could help the existing malaria control methods. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals has developed a malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01E or Mosquirix®, for protecting children against malaria in areas of sub-Saharan Africa where malaria is common. In a large study in young children in Africa, the vaccine was shown to prevent malaria to a certain extent, by reducing the number of times a child gets malaria, but not prevent it completely. The vaccine was assessed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and found to be useful. In October 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that the vaccine be introduced and given to children 5–17 months of age, in parts of 3-5 sub-Saharan African countries in order to: 1) assess how easy it is to give the vaccine in a plan that includes a fourth does, 2) evaluate whether the vaccine reduces childhood deaths and 3) further check vaccine safety in the context of routine vaccination programs. The introduction of the vaccine called pilot implementation will be coordinated by the World Health Organization (WHO) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH). As part of the pilot implementation, GSK will conduct studies which are typically done after a vaccine has been approved, to evaluate the safety of the vaccine by monitoring for adverse events (AEs) such as protocol-defined AEs of special interest (AESI), other AEs leading to hospitalization or death, meningitis as well as how well the vaccine will reduce the burden of malaria in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated groups of children.

Abstract of Study:

The reduction of global malaria burden over the last 15 years has been attributed mainly to the rapid scale-up of key interventions including long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), indoor residual spraying (IRS) and prompt diagnosis and treatment with effective artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). However, these gains are fragile and are threatened by emergence of parasite resistance to antimalarial drugs and vector resistance to insecticides. Additional tools are urgently needed to complement the current interventions. Historically, vaccines have been proven to be one of the most cost-effective means of preventing infectious diseases and saving lives. Therefore, a malaria vaccine could be an important additional tool that could complement the existing malaria control strategies. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals has developed a pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01E, for protecting children against malaria in endemic areas of sub-Saharan Africa. In a large Phase III trial in young African children, the vaccine was shown to prevent malaria with a moderate level of efficacy. The vaccine received positive scientific opinion from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and in October 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended pilot implementation of the vaccine in children 5–17 months of age, in parts of 3-5 sub-Saharan African countries to; 1) assess the programmatic feasibility of delivering the vaccine in a four-dose schedule, 2) evaluate vaccine impact on mortality and 3) further characterize vaccine safety in the context of routine immunization program. The pilot implementation will be coordinated by WHO in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH). As part of the pilot implementation, GSK will conduct post-approval Phase IV studies to evaluate the safety of the vaccine by monitoring for rare adverse events (AEs) such as protocol defined adverse events of special interest (AESI), other AEs leading to hospitalization or death, meningitis as well as the vaccine impact and effectiveness in vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts.